Electromagnetic Fields and Health

Electromagnetic Fields and Health

Today we are surrounded by large amounts of human made EMF’s that we have never before experienced in our evolution. What impact EMF’s have on our health is yet to be fully understood as with cigarette smoking and asbestos exposure there is a high lag period between exposure and manifestation of disease. So although there is a lot of research highlighting the negative health impacts, this research may become more compelling as the health issues become more apparent in the future. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies electromagnetic fields (EMFs) as ‘possibly carcinogenic’ to humans that might transform normal cells into cancer cells (4).

Radiofrequencies (used in mobile phones, cordless phones, baby monitors) were classified by the World Health Organisation on the 31st May 2011 as ‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’.

Early signs of EMF toxicity can be headaches and insomnia.

There are many natural sources of EMF’s such as;

We have evolved with these frequencies and energies and they are really important to our health and wellness. They create a frequency that resonates with us and is kept at a certain level via massive global thunderstorms. Many insects and animals rely on the GeoMF for navigation and migration.

Where are EMF’s?

EMFs are produced for technological applications (e.g., power lines, mobile phones, internet routers), and are also widely used in medicine for diagnostic (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner and microwave imaging) and therapeutic purposes (e.g., radiofrequency and microwave ablation and hyperthermia) (5,6).

Early Research

Currently the research shows that EMF’s generate reactive oxygen species (ROS). Overproduction of ROS can damage cellular components, mainly lipids in membranes and nucleic acids whilst also depleting enzymatic and/or nonenzymatic antioxidants triggering progressive dysfunction resulting in oxidative stress and damage in the cell body (12-17).

EMF’s  have been linked to;

  • Increased incidence of childhood leukaemia (1,2).
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), (7,8)
  • Adult brain cancer (11)
  • Increased incidence of Alzeimers Disease (10)
  • Miscarriage (9)
  • Decreases in melatonin (3)

Other Problems that may be caused due to chronic EMF exposure include;

  • Increased blood brain barrier permeability (18,19)
  • Parkinsons Disease (20-25)
  • Huntington’s Disease (22-25)

Childhood Leukaemia

There are published studies linking childhood leukaemia and close proximity to high voltage transmission lines. 3 milli gauss or higher that their chances of developing childhood leukaemia doubled (1). This is anytime in the first 15 years of their life if they are closer than 600m to the line. In the year 2000 album and greenland – international agency for research and dance that AC magnetic fields were classified as carcinogenic.

This level of more than 3 milli gauss can be easily replicated if a child is sleeping on the other side of a a meter box or an oven that is on. Other problematic appliances which all omit very high AC magnetic fields include fridges or solar inverters, digital clock radio within 30 cm’s of the bed. The amount of milli gauss from these appliance quickly drops off with distance. At home if you are sleeping on the opposite wall to a metre box that can be up to 500 milli gauss, depending on how many appliances are on.

Melatonin Production

Melatonin is a natural hormone produced by pineal gland activity in the brain that regulates the body’s sleep–wake cycle (4). Melatonin is a potent antioxidant within the body. The pineal gland, which in humans is located near the anatomical centre of the brain, is normally responsive to visible electromagnetic fields (ie light) since the eyes are functionally connected to the pineal gland by a series of neurons (3). Normally, the pineal gland produces low amounts of melatonin during the day and high amounts at night (3).

Effects on children

Professor Om Gandhi, head of electrical engineering at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, using life-size models and computer-generated images, found that 5-year-old children absorb 50% more radiation than adults during a call. Scans showed that while radiation spread a short distance from the ear in adults, in the youngest children it spread across most of the brain. More radiation can go through since the child’s ear is thinner, the telephone is closer to the head and this thinner ear doesn’t absorb so much power. Therefore more is able to go past the ear into the head.

Sources of EMFs in your Home

The EMFs of greatest concern are those used in wireless technologies and telecommunications (cordless phone, cell phone, baby monitors). But all EMF’s are a hazard

Other things to look out for at home

Be mindful of what is on the other side of your bedroom wall – especially where your head is. Meter boxes, fridges, ovens, solar inverters – when in use all output large amounts of EMF’s. If your baby is sleeping in a cot on the other side of a wall with an oven that is on, their exposure will be very high (26).

Simple Tips to Reduce Your Exposure

This will depend on the source of the exposure (26).

Distance, distance, distance! As you double the distance away from the lines, you will effectively reduce your exposure by 75%. Homes should be at least 200 metres away from high voltage transmission lines however this may not address the pollution issue. Underground cables are a better alternative as the electric fields are screened by the earth, however the magnetic field will still be present.

What else can I do?

As EMF’s cause free radical damage and we are all exposed to EMF’s everyday we need to ensure we have a diet rich in antioxidant foods.

If your exposure is higher than average due to your work or living environment, or you feel you are sensitive to EMF’s  then you need to consider supplementing with antioxidants;

Antioxidants work in groups so it is always better to have a broad spectrum antioxidant supplement rather than just one or two.


  1. Wertheimer N, Leeper E. Electrical Wiring Configurations and Childhood Cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1979;109(3):273-284.
  2. Claudia Consales, Caterina Merla, Carmela Marino, and Barbara Benassi, “Electromagnetic Fields, Oxidative Stress, and Neurodegeneration,” International Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 2012, Article ID 683897, 16 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/683897.
  3. R.J. Reiter, Electromagnetic fields and melatonin production, Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, Volume 47, Issue 10, 1993, Pages 439-444, ISSN 0753-3322,
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0753-3322(93)90340- (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/075333229390340Q)
  4. Malka N. Halgamuge; Pineal melatonin level disruption in humans due to electromagnetic fields and ICNIRP limits, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, Volume 154, Issue 4, 1 May 2013, Pages 405–416, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs255
  5. W. R. Adey, “Tissue interactions with nonionizing electromagnetic fields,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 435–514, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Lacy-Hulbert, J. C. Metcalfe, and R. Hesketh, “Biological responses to electromagnetic fields,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 395–420, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Y. Li and F. C. Sung, “Association between occupational exposure to power frequency electromagnetic fields and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review,” American Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 212–220, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. HAYNAL and F. REGLI, “Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with accumulated electric injury,” Confinia Neurologica, vol. 24, pp. 189–198, 1964. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Juutilainen, P. Matilainen, S. Saarikoski, E. Läärä, and S. Suonio, “Early pregnancy loss and exposure to 50-Hz magnetic fields,” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 229–236, 1993. View at Google Scholar ·View at Scopus
  10. Z. Davanipour, C. C. Tseng, P. J. Lee, and E. Sobel, “A case-control study of occupational magnetic field exposure and Alzheimer’s disease: results from the California Alzheimer’s Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Centers,” BMC Neurology, vol. 7, article 13, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar ·View at Scopus
  11. D. P. Loomis and D. A. Savitz, “Mortality from brain cancer and leukaemia among electrical workers,” British Journal of Industrial Medicine, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 633–638, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Harakawa, N. Inoue, T. Hori et al., “Effects of a 50?Hz electric field on plasma lipid peroxide level and antioxidant activity in rats,” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 589–594, 2005. View at Publisher ·View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. H. Repacholi and B. Greenebaum, “Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: health effects and research needs,” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 133–160, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Jajte, J. Grzegorczyk, M. Zmysacute, and E. Rajkowska, “Effect of 7?mT static magnetic field and iron ions on rat lymphocytes: apoptosis, necrosis and free radical processes,” Bioelectrochemistry, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 107–111, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Z. Akdag, M. H. Bilgin, S. Dasdag, and C. Tumer, “Alteration of nitric oxide production in rats exposed to a prolonged, extremely low-frequency magnetic field,” Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 99–106, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. C. Scaiano, N. Mohtat, F. L. Cozens, J. McLean, and A. Thansandote, “Application of the radical pair mechanism to free radicals in organized systems: can the effects of 60?Hz be predicted from studies under static fields?” Bioelectromagnetics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 549–554, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Simkó, “Cell type specific redox status is responsible for diverse electromagnetic field effects,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1141–1152, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar ·View at Scopus
  18. Jun Tang, Yuan Zhang, Liming Yang, Qianwei Chen, Liang Tan, Shilun Zuo, Hua Feng, Zhi Chen, Gang Zhu, Exposure to 900MHz electromagnetic fields activates the mkp-1/ERK pathway and causes blood-brain barrier damage and cognitive impairment in rats,
    Brain Research, Volume 1601, 2015, Pages 92-101, ISSN 0006-8993,
  19. tam, Rianne. (2010). Electromagnetic fields and the blood–brain barrier. Brain research reviews. 65. 80-97. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.001.
  20. L. S. Wechsler, H. Checkoway, G. M. Franklin, and L. G. Costa, “A pilot study of occupational and environmental risk factors for Parkinson’s disease,” NeuroToxicology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 387–392, 1991.View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. A. Savitz, H. Checkoway, and D. P. Loomis, “Magnetic field exposure and neurodegenerative disease mortality among electric utility workers,” Epidemiology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 398–404, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. Johansen, “Exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of central nervous system disease in utility workers,” Epidemiology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 539–543, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar ·View at Scopus
  23. D. A. Savitz, D. P. Loomis, and C. K. J. Tse, “Electrical occupations and neurodegenerative disease: analysis of U.S. Mortality data,” Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. W. Noonan, J. S. Reif, M. Yost, and J. Touchstone, “Occupational exposure to magnetic fields in case-referent studies of neurodegenerative diseases,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Huss, A. Spoerri, M. Egger, and M. Röösli, “Residence near power lines and mortality from neurodegenerative diseases: longitudinal study of the Swiss population,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 169, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Nicole Bijlsma – https://www.buildingbiology.com.au/